To read part 1. of this article click below:

''Why do our desires and actions sometimes not align? Part 1.''

Continued...

Question: What about flipping a coin for two ideas and observing which one you actually wanted based on your reaction?

Answer: There are different tricks. Visualization is enough to see if you would be satisfied with something. Sometimes, what we think we want can lead us further away from ourselves because it might take away even bigger priorities. You can have 100% priorities or 100% desires.

You can also achieve all or most of your desires, but when a person has many options, they often contradict each other. For example, if one desire is "I want to be completely alone in the forest and isolated," while another is "I want to be a famous actor in Hollywood," it’s very difficult to achieve both desires. At least not in the same period.

That’s the sandbox we have on Earth. Everything depends on how achievable these desires are. If they are achievable, you can try them out and see if you like them. However, if something takes decades of work, you can’t just "try it." As they see the ideas of parallel worlds, they see big changes. It’s not about which store to visit today, but about big changes. Macro level. If we ask ourselves, "Would this change my life?" and the answer is yes, then anything can impact you in some way.

Q: So, somewhere there is a person who took the other path?

A: One person followed the predetermined path, and another went somewhere else? These things are hard to explain because an idea of the world or that person remains and lives on. But our body is here, in a way. We have multiple paths, but in reality, we are one being. Our soul is here; the other simply continues. They don’t see it as if one life had millions of variations. Those paths continue, but they end with us.

Q: When we finish?

A: They end with us at the moment. The idea of that path continues, but it ends with us when we move on. There are physical and mental variants.

Q: So it’s more like an imprint?

A: Yes, the idea continues, but physically we’ve moved on. Like when we lose a certain person, we can continue their life mentally, but physically, it has ended. At this moment, they don’t see the sense in having 50,000,000 souls for one soul/life.

Q: Because that person can make more drastic changes?

A: Yes, they don’t see the sense in there being more "us" in these worlds. They see too much. Our physical form is one. Maybe in the future, they will see it differently. They don’t see the point in having a new planet for every decision for every person. There’s one path at the end that you take, and that path has multiple directions.

Q: So it’s more about ideas?

A: Yes, more about a mental imprint. Meanwhile, with our decisions, we make a physical imprint. That’s how they see it. A list of priorities is important because each person has something that is crucial for their mental balance. If a person really enjoys movement and is a very physical person, but wants a job where they have to sit for 9 hours a day or won’t have any time for movement, then if that’s high on their list of priorities, achieving that goal/job isn’t worth it.

Automatically, for your achievements, you sacrifice your well-being. If someone really values the sea, but the "ideal" job is in Canada, then you need to look at where that desire is on your list of priorities. You need to reconsider whether it’s really the ideal job. The further down the list a priority is, the easier it is to sacrifice it. As children, we don’t have a list of priorities. We don’t yet know what we want. That’s why their desires change so quickly, as their character is also still forming.

Q: What about strong desires you’ve had since childhood? Could that be the influence of past lives?

A: Yes, that’s possible too. As a child, continuing through life, there is a base of the soul. Something that doesn’t have a physical foundation. And they say that just as our desires are not always good for us, it’s not necessary that our lists of priorities are correct.

For example, if free time is important to someone, but that same free time brings them mental imbalance, they say you need to look at what’s actually good for you, not just what you "think" is. If there’s a predetermined path that isn’t working for you, and you need a drastic change of direction, you might have to sacrifice things you think are beneficial.

Q: How can a person figure that out?

A: They say it depends on how satisfied you are with your current situation because if you were, you wouldn’t be dealing with this. When something doesn’t suit a person in their current situation, it’s time for a change. If you don’t feel right, then you don’t need to follow that path. But if a person feels there’s more they could achieve mentally, physically, or otherwise, it’s good to organize your priorities based on what you really need. If we have a history of not wanting to do something, but it’s good for us, then that needs to become a priority.

Q: So it can go the other way too? That a person who is content doesn’t need a list of priorities?

A: Yes, they say you should start from how you feel because if you were satisfied with your job, for example, you wouldn’t even think about other jobs. You need to find a middle ground where you feel good but also do something about it. The golden mean.

If someone loves free time but also needs to be a little busy to feel productive, they won’t go 100% into productivity without any free time. Something in between. To live your life in a way you enjoy, that’s the higher goal. And then, depending on how dissatisfied you are, it determines what changes are needed.

Q: A person lives 60-80 years. Is it even possible to live as we want?

A: Sometimes challenges arise... The best approach is flexibility. Throughout life, which follows a certain path, you need to steer it. Like anything else, you need to adjust the compass. In the end, it’s just about being okay. Even changes in direction are unpleasant, but they are necessary at the right time. A shift is like a small earthquake.

Why does laziness exist when we have bigger desires?

That’s what they were talking about. There’s a good chance that the shift from your current path is too big. If the goal is on a path where we can’t move, it’s too far away. We haven’t processed something within ourselves yet. We’re not ready to give something up for that goal. They see it as needing to give something to the path for it to give us the gift of a new path. The gift we give is actually something we leave behind.

If someone is walking on a flat path and comes to a mountain where they want to climb to the top, they have to ask, "For this new path up the mountain, do I need to leave my backpack here? But there are a few things in it that I need." You have to decide if that mountain is worth it. If it is, and if that backpack isn’t high on your list of priorities, you have to leave it behind and move forward. That’s a metaphor for how they see things. The things we give up or leave behind, we leave with ourselves. The new path is a gift of a new self to us.